AI Memecoin Dev Credibility Scanner

Is their
GitHub
real?

Every AI memecoin has a dev. Every dev has a GitHub. We scan it, score it, and tell you if they actually know how to code — or if it's just vibes and forks.

github.com/
try:
torvalds
AiAgentDev
0xmemedev
gaearon
// process

How it works

Paste a GitHub username or org. We run 6 credibility checks in seconds and return a verified score with a full breakdown.

01
Paste the URL
Drop any GitHub username, repo, or org link. We normalize and parse it automatically.
02
We pull the data
Commit history, repo quality, contributor identities, code complexity — pulled directly from the GitHub API.
03
AI analyzes it
Our model cross-references claims vs. evidence. Detects bot commits, forked repos, burst activity before launches.
04
Get the verdict
A score out of 10, a tier verdict, and a downloadable share card you can post anywhere.
// detection signals

What we check

Six layers of analysis. Built specifically for AI memecoin dev credibility.

🔬
Code authenticity
Are commits real diffs or just whitespace changes? Is it original code or a renamed fork?
diff analysisfork detectioncomplexity scoring
Commit timing patterns
Suspiciously even spacing = automated commits. We detect burst activity right before token launches.
temporal analysisbot detectionlaunch correlation
👤
Developer identity
Do contributor accounts have prior history? Or did they appear 2 weeks before TGE?
account ageprior projectssocial cross-ref
📊
Activity consistency
Real devs ship consistently over months. LARPs post a GitHub 48hrs before launch and go silent after.
longitudinal scangap detectionvelocity score
🧠
Claim vs evidence ratio
README says "AI-powered multi-agent system" but the code is 12 lines of Node.js?
readme parsingcode analysisbuzzword scoring
🔗
Contract alignment
Does the deployed contract match the tech stack they claim? Or is the GitHub totally unrelated to the token?
contract scanstack matchingchain verification
// verdict taxonomy

The tier list

Every scanned project gets placed into one of six tiers. No exceptions.

S
Satoshi-tier Builder
Years of consistent commits. Original code. Real contributors with track records. Ships without announcing it.
torvaldsgaearonantirez
9.0 – 10
A
Verified Builder
Legitimate dev history. Multiple real projects. Claims match the code. Minor red flags at most.
levelsiojonhoo
7.0 – 8.9
B
Unverified But Trying
Some real code exists. Inconsistent history. Might be early-career or anon. Could go either way.
new devsanon builders
5.0 – 6.9
C
Suspicious Activity
Burst commits before launch. Thin repo history. README claims don't match the codebase.
fork-and-renameburst commits
3.0 – 4.9
D
Probable LARP
Account created days before TGE. Empty repos. Copy-pasted contracts. "AI-powered" with zero ML code.
AiAgentDevtge-day accounts
1.5 – 2.9
F
Full LARP. Run.
One repo. One commit. "Initial commit" with a blank README. Token already at $5M market cap.
0xmemedevthe classics
0 – 1.4